I would really like to read the report of Zeidman. I really don't know what is going on here. What about the testimony of Col. Phil Waldron, the information war expert, who testified before Pennsylvania legislative committee that the Dominion machines are designed for vote switching (more precisely race based weighted counting). Why is he not being sued? And Dr. Shiva who has testified that these machines report fractional vote counts? How can you have a partial vote? Why can't we see the code? What about the hacking demonstration done (at Michigan State?) ? What about Dr. Douglas Frank's statistical analysis of vote counts? Voter turnout was sometimes very impressive.
Why is there any software used at all? Paper ballots mean nothing if software is involved.
Did you see the movie about Tina Peters? Something is going on. Was she the victim of lawfare?
What about Liz Harris being expelled from the Az legislature? Why did the Maricopa Board of Elections do everything possible to impede the audit? Have they ever turn over the routers?
Why did Fox news just fold? Spreading false information is not actionable, look at what all the media did with the Russian hoax.
There was no trial with Fox, so there was no Dominion discovery. We had no experts look at their code, for instance. Of course, it is hackable, every code is.
Who was this impartial arbitration board? Were their deliberations broadcast? Did Lindell defend? Did his experts testify?
We swim in an ocean of lies. This story is not over yet.
Basically, Mr. Ramirez, you are relying on authority, in this case a arbitration board. You need to look at primary sources.
Anything electronic can be hacked. The challenge with Dominion is proving it. Fox probably could have won on appeal, but rumor is Rupert Murdoch did not want to testify.
I'm sure you are aware that Abe Hamadeh may very likely be replacing the Attorney General in Arizona (over turning the election) due to vote counting irregularities--something that hasn't occurred in more than 100 years. My sense is we don't know what we don't know. Voter fraud has occurred in every election to some degree. To say it doesn't occur or that an elderly demented man who spent his time in his basement and could not effectively debate a four year old was elected to highest office without any shenanigans on the part of the DEM party beggars belief.
I would really like to read the report of Zeidman. I really don't know what is going on here. What about the testimony of Col. Phil Waldron, the information war expert, who testified before Pennsylvania legislative committee that the Dominion machines are designed for vote switching (more precisely race based weighted counting). Why is he not being sued? And Dr. Shiva who has testified that these machines report fractional vote counts? How can you have a partial vote? Why can't we see the code? What about the hacking demonstration done (at Michigan State?) ? What about Dr. Douglas Frank's statistical analysis of vote counts? Voter turnout was sometimes very impressive.
Why is there any software used at all? Paper ballots mean nothing if software is involved.
Did you see the movie about Tina Peters? Something is going on. Was she the victim of lawfare?
What about Liz Harris being expelled from the Az legislature? Why did the Maricopa Board of Elections do everything possible to impede the audit? Have they ever turn over the routers?
Why did Fox news just fold? Spreading false information is not actionable, look at what all the media did with the Russian hoax.
There was no trial with Fox, so there was no Dominion discovery. We had no experts look at their code, for instance. Of course, it is hackable, every code is.
Who was this impartial arbitration board? Were their deliberations broadcast? Did Lindell defend? Did his experts testify?
We swim in an ocean of lies. This story is not over yet.
Basically, Mr. Ramirez, you are relying on authority, in this case a arbitration board. You need to look at primary sources.
Anything electronic can be hacked. The challenge with Dominion is proving it. Fox probably could have won on appeal, but rumor is Rupert Murdoch did not want to testify.
I'm sure you are aware that Abe Hamadeh may very likely be replacing the Attorney General in Arizona (over turning the election) due to vote counting irregularities--something that hasn't occurred in more than 100 years. My sense is we don't know what we don't know. Voter fraud has occurred in every election to some degree. To say it doesn't occur or that an elderly demented man who spent his time in his basement and could not effectively debate a four year old was elected to highest office without any shenanigans on the part of the DEM party beggars belief.